IMF Executive Board Concludes 2019 Article IV Consultation with Belgium

March 8, 2019

On March 6, 2019, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation [1] with Belgium.

Belgium’s economy has performed well since the global financial crisis. Real GDP per capita has surpassed its pre-crisis level, unemployment has reached its lowest level in four decades, and employment has risen. The fiscal deficit narrowed to under 1 percent of GDP in 2018, and public debt, though still high, continued to decline. These outcomes have been supported by fiscal and structural reforms undertaken in recent years, including a key pension reform, an overhaul of the corporate income tax regime, and a reduction in labor taxes, among others.

Over the last year, activity has moderated, with real GDP growth declining to 1.4 percent in 2018 from 1.7 percent in 2017, as weaker external demand weighed on export growth, and private consumption growth slowed. Growth is expected to reach 1.3 percent in 2019 and remain moderate at around 1.5 percent over the medium term.

Key challenges ahead include sluggish potential growth and a still high level of public debt.

Executive Board Assessment [2]

Executive Directors commended the authorities for their reform efforts in recent years, which have contributed to sustained growth, strong employment growth, and a notable reduction of the fiscal deficit. They encouraged the authorities to take advantage of the current favorable economic conditions to press ahead with further reforms to enhance the economy’s resilience and boost its growth potential.

Directors agreed that rebuilding fiscal buffers remains a priority given the high level of public debt and pressures from population aging. They encouraged the authorities to pursue further fiscal consolidation to achieve their medium term objective of a structurally balanced budget and put debt on a firmly downward path, with some Directors noting a need to strike a balance between consolidation and growth. Directors emphasized that spending reforms, notably increasing the efficiency of spending and better targeting social benefits, will contribute to a more sustainable fiscal position. They also recommended further reform of the pension system to curb the long term costs of aging. Directors highlighted that spending reforms should be complemented by measures to safeguard revenues, including further reducing deductions and exemptions.

Directors emphasized that reforms to enhance labor force participation and reduce the fragmentation of the labor market are critical for achieving higher, more inclusive growth, and encouraged the authorities to implement the planned “jobs deal” reform. To better integrate vulnerable groups, Directors also recommended pursuing further efforts to address educational gaps, improve the quality of training and lifelong learning, and reduce barriers to geographical mobility. They noted that better linking wages to productivity could help to improve the allocation of resources and support overall competitiveness.

Directors encouraged continued implementation of reforms of product and service markets and the business environment to support productivity and growth. They welcomed recent initiatives to promote financing, through the new “Growth Fund,” and develop an ecosystem for young, innovative firms with growth potential. Directors saw scope to further streamline and harmonize regulations, increase investment in infrastructure, improve the efficiency of R&D spending, and strengthen competition in services and regulated professions.

Directors recognized the improved resilience of the financial sector but noted that recent strong credit growth has contributed to rising corporate and household debt and housing prices. They welcomed the central bank’s new macroprudential measures aimed at the housing market and encouraged the authorities to stand ready to activate the countercyclical buffer to build up further resilience, should cyclical risks intensify. Directors also encouraged the authorities to continue to enhance risk monitoring and ensure the feasibility and effectiveness of bank resolution strategies. Continuing the implementation of the remaining FSAP recommendations will be helpful in this regard.

Belgium: Selected Economic Indicators (2016–19)

2016

2017

2018

2019

Est.

Proj.

Real economy

Real GDP

1.5

1.7

1.4

1.3

Domestic demand

2.1

1.1

0.7

1.3

Foreign balance1

-0.5

0.6

0.8

0.0

Exports, goods and services

7.6

5.0

3.3

2.8

Imports, goods and services

8.5

4.3

2.5

2.9

Potential output growth

1.2

1.2

1.3

1.4

Output gap (in percent)

-0.4

0.1

0.2

0.2

Employment

Unemployment rate (in percent)

7.8

7.1

5.9

5.9

Employment growth

1.3

1.4

1.6

1.0

Prices

Consumer prices

1.8

2.2

2.3

1.9

GDP deflator

1.8

1.7

1.3

1.8

Public finance

Revenue

50.6

51.3

51.3

50.7

Expenditure

53.0

52.2

52.1

51.9

General government balance

-2.4

-0.9

-0.8

-1.2

Structural balance

-2.2

-1.4

-1.6

-1.4

Primary balance

0.4

1.6

1.5

0.9

General government debt

105.5

103.0

101.0

99.2

Balance of payments

Goods and services balance

1.1

1.0

0.9

0.8

Current account

-0.6

0.7

0.4

0.3

Exchange rates

Euro per U.S. dollar, period average

0.9

0.8

0.9

NEER, ULC-styled (2005=100)

98.9

101.3

100.9

REER, ULC-based (2005=100)

99.4

102.9

103.4

Memorandum items

Nominal GDP (in billions of euros)

424.7

439.1

451.3

465.2

Population (in millions)

11.3

11.4

11.4

11.5

Sources: Haver Analytics, Belgian authorities, and IMF staff projections.

1 Contribution to GDP growth.



[1] Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country's economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.

[2] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://0-www-imf-org.library.svsu.edu/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.

IMF Communications Department
MEDIA RELATIONS

PRESS OFFICER: Gediminas Vilkas

Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org